The Story Of Titanic Survivor Masabumi Hosono

Masabumi Hosono


In the early hours of April 15, 1912, Masabumi Hosono was awoken in his cabin to alarming news: the ship he was travelling on had hit an iceberg—and the situation was critical. The Titanic was sinking. As a foreigner and second-class passenger he was ordered downstairs, away from the lifeboats; but amid the turmoil on board he managed to sneak onto the deck. In a letter titled “On Board R.M.S. Titanic” that he frantically penned to his wife as the tragedy unfolded, he describes the sight that greeted him there. Orienting himself by the glow of flares in the air, Hosono found his way to Lifeboat 13, the only rescue boat yet to launch. Under instructions from the crew, the men present were guiding the women and children onto the vessel. When the order arrived to lower the craft into the sea, there were two seats left. A man leapt past Hosono and claimed one of them, leaving the Japanese man with the last empty seat—and a choice to make.

Faced with this textbook moral dilemma, Hosono chose life, and lived to regret it. Whereas Brits fortunate enough to survive returned home as heroes, he had a different fate in store. Both the Japanese government and the general public found his survival intensely embarrassing. After all, he hadn’t done anything spectacular or noteworthy, he had simply survived—and apparently at the expense of one of the 162 women and children who died. The Japanese media initially centered their coverage on his emotional reunion with his family, but they soon changed tack and began publishing critical articles in which he was accused of cowardice. The US papers joined in the attack. Hosono’s course of action was compared with the noble self-sacrifice of such passengers as the American Benjamin Guggenheim, who famously changed into his best evening wear and prepared to drown alongside his manservant, rather than take the place of a woman or child in a lifeboat.

Hosono returned to a very hostile Japan. Found guilty of noncomformity to the “women and children first” principle, and of evading an honorable death, he was subjected to mura hachibu—the Japanese term for social ostracism. He was forced out of his career as a civil servant and bombarded with hate mail, and his “cowardice” was reportedly made an example of in a popular girls’ etiquette schoolbook of the time—one which his own daughter was made to study. His suicide was called for in letters to newspapers, and from other quarters. He became a recluse; even after the public grew bored of the story, he refused to discuss it publicly. When the excitement had ebbed away, he was reinstated in the civil service—largely due to a quirk of fate. According to historian Charles Pellegrino, in his book Farewell Titanic, after the 1923 Kanto earthquake devastated much of the Japanese rail network, Hosono was simply too qualified to remain unemployed. His job was quietly returned to him, and the nation joined him in pretending that nothing had happened. He continued to live in quiet shame until his death from natural causes in 1939, though his persecution didn’t end there: upon the sinking of the Toya Maru (a Japanese liner) in 1954, Hosono’s precedent was exhumed as an example of an ignoble death in the midst of disaster.
In short, Hosono was criticized for not channeling the samurai spirit and going to a noble death. Japan in 1915 was relatively new to the world stage, and striving to impress the West with its sophistication. Fresh from two stunning military victories over China and Russia, the nation was eager to display the code of patriotic self-sacrifice that underlay its military prowess. Hosono had violated this code and lost face, so the fervently nationalistic Japanese society had no choice but to disown him.
From the body of letters and memoirs that Hosono left behind emerges an altogether more complex moral picture. “Cowardice” was the watchword in the press coverage, but in reality it was hardly the sole explanation for his behavior. Though he was aware of the need “not to leave behind anything disgraceful as a Japanese,” it appears that his sense of patriotic duty was outweighed by sheer love for his family. In his letter to his wife, he wrote that his most “depressing thought was that he would not be able to see [his] beloved wife and children again.” Elsewhere, he admits that “the first man’s example” was what ultimately convinced him to jump. He counters claims that he didn’t think his actions through properly, and his anguish comes through in extended passages in which he discusses his moral predicament. A humane compassion, totally at odds with his media portrayal as a self-preserving coward, comes through in his description of the chaos on deck. He writes of his despair at watching the ship disappear, “a tangible, graceful sight… reduced to a mere void.”
What’s more, the facts and testimonies that have emerged since the disaster suggest that Hosono’s actions may not have been as selfish as portrayed by the contemporaneous media. Many lifeboats, including Lifeboat 13, embarked before they had reached full capacity; as many as two in five seats in Hosono’s vessel were unoccupied. The evidence suggests that the “women and children first” policy may have actually caused some men to hold back from boarding a lifeboat, needlessly causing their own deaths. While 324 of the 438 female passengers survived, under a fifth of the men did. Hosono’s detractors had been quick to equate one man’s survival with the death of one woman or child, but we now know this to be an unfair conclusion.
Such assumptions stemmed from inaccuracies, which were rife in reports of the disaster. Additionally, certain allegations made against Hosono might have stemmed from a confusion between him and other Asians on board. In the Senate inquiry immediately opened upon return of survivors to the US, Quartermaster George Rowe testified that Asian people aboard his lifeboat who refused to leave were “Chinamen… or Filipinos.” Similarly, a passenger found adrift on a makeshift raft by the steward George Crowe was described as “a Japanese or Chinese young fellow.” Another “Japanese” was picked up by Lifeboat 14, and impressed his co-passengers by taking up the oars despite suffering from exposure. Subsequent research has shown that he could not have been Japanese, as there was not one on the Titanic bar Hosono. Even the passengers in Lifeboat 13 were confused about Hosono’s nationality, with many testifying that he was Armenian. Matt Taylor, a noted Titanic scholar who recently investigated Hosono’s fate, writes that “his diary does show that certain cowardly acts commited by other Asians… had been mistakenly attributed to him.” In light of these revelations, the Japanese government granted Hosono a poshumous pardon in 1997.
The release in 1997 of James Cameron’s blockbuster Titanic renewed interest in the disaster in general, and prompted a re-evaluation of Hosono’s case in particular. His letter to his wife, written on what’s believed to be the only surviving piece of Titanic stationery, was rediscovered in a drawer, and its moving description of Hosono’s moment of “disgrace” attracted much public sympathy. His grandson, famous for his involvement with the Japanese bands Yellow Magic Orchestra and Happy End, has used this platform to retell his grandfather’s story. In a recent interview, Haruomi “Harry” Hosono expressed his family’s desire to show the other side of Hosono: that of a devoted family man whose only wish was to see his wife and children again. At a recent exhibition that retold his grandfather’s amazing journey, Haruomi was visibly moved. 
From Metropolis

Comments

Popular Posts