Posing in a fighter |
The Abe regime's reinterpretation of the constitution, to put it
bluntly, Japan has suffered a military coup. Abe has boasted that what
he did was comparable to the Meiji revolution. Even The Asahi Newspaper
editorialized that black is now officially white.
A constitution that
clearly and forever renounced war and preparations for war is now said
to mean that the Japanese military can join Washington in its wars for
oil and natural gas in the Middle East or in the South China Sea under
the guise of protecting Japan's essential energy supplies. Japanese
military operations need not be limited to collaborations - termed
collective security - with the US. Japanese military operations can also
now be launched with nations with which Japan is deemed to close
relations, for example the Philippines, Vietnam or India - independent
of the United States.
A Cabinet decision also can clear the
way for first-strike Japanese attacks against China or North Korea has
been opened. Further, we now read that Abe plans to seek the right to
dispatch Japanese military forces anywhere in the world without
consulting the Diet.
Japan appears no longer to be a
constitutional democracy. The "reinterpretation" reflects total
disregard not only for the Constitution, but for democracy itself. The
Constitution was functionally amended by fiat, rather than by the
democratic process required by Article 96 - and it is being imposed
despite the opposition of the majority of Japanese people. There was no bill created in the House of Representatives and voted on by the whole Diet. There was then no mandate to the Japanese citizenry by way of ballot. Instead the Abe regime simply by demand changed the Constitution. Abe is leading a coup.
One day after the Constitution was trashed |
In addition
to its further opening the way for Japanese militarism, this autocratic
reinterpretation means that in the future the constitutional commitments
to human rights could be equally vulnerable. We need to take the
mainstream Japanese press seriously when it writes that Abe is
"imitating" the early Showa Era, when the military intelligence
protection act left "the public feeling unable to speak freely."
Abe's disrespect for the law is not limited to the Constitution. He is
apparently also acting illegally as he presses construction of the
massive new US Marine Air Base at Henoko.
Despite Abe's nationalist credentials, the reinterpretation needs
also to be understood in the context of Japan's client state role. In
the last Armitage-Nye report, issued as Abe returned to power, we saw
the US stepping up the pressure for Japan's leaders to revise the
Constitution. Why? Because as it works to compensate for the relative
decline of the United States, Washington is demanding more of its
allies.
All of this helps to explain why, immediately after the
reinterpretation, it was announced that a Maritime Self Defense officer
was being dispatched to serve at the Pentagon with the US Chief of Naval
Operations to "enhanc[e] the operational integration of the US Navy and
the MSDF [Japan's Maritime Self Defense Force].
Dr. Joseph Gerson
No comments:
Post a Comment
No racism, foul language, or spam. The rationale for your comment should be: Would I speak to my mother like this? We reserve the right to reject, edit, or delete comments at our discretion.
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.